Complacency, recognizing risk, and managing risk

In the June 7, 2010 edition of The Washington Post, Robert J. Samuelson has an opinion piece on how complacency affects our ability to recognize risk. (Read the full article here: Oil spill reveals the dangers of success.) While Samuelson begins with the example of the BP oil spill off the Gulf Coast, he notes that we’ve seen the same pattern in other “national setbacks,” like the recent financial crisis. He writes:

“Success tends to breed carelessness and complacency. People take more risks because they don’t think they’re taking risks. The regulated and the regulators often react similarly because they’ve shared similar experiences. The financial crisis didn’t occur so much because regulation was absent (many major financial institutions were regulated) but because regulators didn’t grasp the dangers. They, too, were conditioned by belief in the Great Moderation and lower financial volatility.”

Every year, our strategic planning teams work with clients to identify potential threats to their companies. There are two actions a team can take in response to a threat:

  • You can substantially reduce the impact and/or possibility of the threat actually happening. For example you can diversify your client and supplier base to minimize the impact of losing one big customer.
  • You can establish and sustain a recovery capability. For example you can create a sustainable IT disaster recovery plan that includes verified backups, and a backup site already configured with sufficient power and space.

One big challenge to a team’s thinking about threats is what Nassim Nicholas Taleb has labeled a Black Swan. A Black Swan is a highly improbable and unpredictable event with a massive impact that we can’t anticipate by looking at the past. Black Swans are hard to manage for because of their rarity, extreme impact, and unpredictability. Black Swan events our clients have experienced include:

  • A massive fire storm in California surrounded their manufacturing plant.
  • A Fortune 500 client suddenly went belly up, dramatically cutting revenue, losing a big chunk of receivables, and leaving a warehouse full of unsellable specialized parts.
  • A sudden economic collapse that cut revenue overnight by over 30%.

These events were rare, unpredictable and had the potential of major impact. Our clients survived each of these Black Swans. The catastrophic impact of a fire wiping out the corporate HQ was blunted by multiple strategies including storing a portion of the long-lead-time components in another office on the east coast. Over the five years before the Fortune 500 company went bankrupt our client diversified their customer base, reducing the F500 client from 80% of revenue to under 30%. Flexible staffing, accurate real-time production tracking, and effective automation enabled our client to be profitable in the face of a 30% revenue drop.Each of the elements critical to these firms surviving their Black Swans can be traced back to their strategic planning. That’s because strategic planning allowed them to recognize the threat, develop strategies for reducing the risk, and change the status quo by implementing those strategies.

As Samuelson noted at the end of his op-ed piece, “It is human nature to celebrate success by relaxing. The challenge we face is how to acknowledge this urge without being duped by it.”

A strategic plan developed and implemented by your executive team accelerates growth and can also keep a Black Swan event from destroying all your hard work.

Posted in Strategic Planning | Tagged | Leave a comment

Strategic Delegation: The Key to Increased Productivity

Strategic Delegation: The Key to Increased Productivity and Higher Performance

Most CEOs dream of running an organization in which all managers spend the majority of their time improving the business rather than working in the business. These CEOs also wish their employees would perform at their highest potential, take personal responsibility for roles and outcomes, and be held accountable for results. In sum, these leaders of industry want to optimize – not just maximize – productivity, performance, and profitability from every individual.

Fortunately, there is a management tool to accomplish this: strategic delegation of tasks is the key to optimizing the value of each employee’s output.

To read of full copy of my article on how to implement strategic delegation published in the April 2010 issue of Employment Relations Today go to the articles page of myrna.com.

Posted in HR Management, Strategic Planning | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Profile your best customers

Most customer bases follow the Pareto Principle. 20% of your customers are likely to represent 80% of your revenue. 80% come either directly or through referrals and testimonials. Further, it’s likely that 20% of that 20% – i.e. 4% – will account for 80% of the 80% (or 64%).

It is useful to group your customers based on their current value to your organization. Label your top 4% as your Platinum customers, the next 16% as Gold. The Platinum and Gold clients account for most of your current business. The next 30% are Silver, followed by another 30% of Bronze. What will it take to convert your Silver and Bronze customers into Gold and Silver?

For more thoughts on this concept take a look at our Profile your best customers newsletter on that topic.

Posted in Strategic Planning | Leave a comment

Do you have a Neanderthal business model?

Do you have a Neanderthal business model?

Is your company living hand to mouth? Is every employee focused on finding and processing enough revenue to survive this month? If so, you have a Neanderthal business model.

The Neanderthals had physically larger brains than we do. On average, the height of Neanderthals was comparable to that of contemporaneous Homo sapiens, though they were much stronger, having particularly powerful arms and hands.

Yet, they disappeared over 24,000 years ago while modern Homo sapiens spread across the entire earth. Why?

There are many theories, but the most interesting to me is the simple matter of each species’ “monthly nut.” It is estimated that to sustain the average Neanderthal you needed 152,250 calories/month. To sustain the average Homo sapiens you needed 60,917 calories/month. That difference carried three major impacts:

  • The typical Neanderthal community needed to devote 100% of each member’s available time to the search for food.
  • The typical Homo sapiens community had enough surplus food every month to devote significant time to innovative, non-calorie producing activities.
  • The ability of the Homo sapiens community to survive periodic bad times and increased competition was substantially greater than the Neanderthals’.

Economically speaking, the year 2009 was one of those periodic bad times. Congratulations to your company for surviving! But how robust is your company compared to your competitors? How much “investment” resource is available each month, above and beyond what’s needed to cover this month’s expenses?

It’s human nature to focus on the tactical, urgent challenges of today while putting off the investments that will make the future better. However, there’s wisdom in a business model that focuses on increasing sales while decreasing the cost of supporting them, making your company more robust and sustainable. This is the goal and outcome of a well executed strategic planning process. Look at our web page listing the other benefits of strategic planning.

Posted in Strategic Planning | Tagged | Leave a comment

Have you been McKinseyed by your biggest customer?

“What is the largest percentage of revenue your biggest client can represent before you get nervous about putting too many eggs in one basket?” That is a key question you must answer during your annual strategic planning meeting. The larger the percentage of your revenue that comes from any one client, the greater the risk.

You can lose that client overnight, even if the client loves you. They could go bankrupt, taking out not only future revenue but also receivables and any specialized inventory you’re holding for them. They could be acquired by a company that uses an alternate supplier. The client’s in-house buyer could be replaced by someone with different relationships. Or, as our client named it, you could be “McKinseyed.”

What is McKinseyed, you ask? Every few years, one of our strategic planning clients comes under price pressure. One of their customers hires a consulting firm, often McKinsey, to help them improve profitability. The consultant bombards that customer’s vendors, including our client, with endless questions about how long it takes the vendor to perform each little microstep in delivering the service. The consultant then conceptually unbundles each vendor’s service, identifying each of the microsteps that costs more than a competitor’s or which they consider to be valueless. They then insist that the vendor, our client, has to reduce their price to match the consultant’s analysis.

However, it’s unreasonable to expect a vendor to continue to provide a high value-added bundled service at a dramatically reduced price. The only response to being McKinseyed is to unbundle your service. Update the service agreement to make explicit what the client receives for the new, reduced price. Establish charges for anything outside this service agreement. And, this is the hardest part, charge for everything. Changing your company’s pricing and service culture is always a challenge, but that’s another blog.

Your executive team can be your most valuable asset. Strategic planning is the most effective tool to utilize that team. For more ideas on how to fully utilize that team read my Wiley Employment Relations Today article on How to Double Impact — And Output — of Your Management Team.

Posted in Marketing, Strategic Planning | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Is your strategic plan a virtual secret?

During a strategic planning meeting, we asked each member of the planning team: “What have we learned about strategic planning?” The company’s president observed that she had always operated from a plan. The difference now was that the plan was no longer locked in her mind, a virtual secret to the rest of the team.

The power of a team-derived strategic plan was not that it was better than the plans she had produced by herself in the past. (Although sometimes they were.) The power was that the entire team shared the plan and they could judge their daily actions against that plan. A plan that the implementation team was vested in produced better results than the most brilliant plan developed in isolation by the CEO or an industry expert consultant.

For more insights on making sure your strategic plan gets executed, take a look at the article I wrote for the Business Strategy Series.

Posted in Strategic Planning | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Double your salesforce overnight through strategic delegation

Without making any new hires, do you know how to find the human resources you need to execute the growth plans that came out of your strategic planning session?

Start by determining how much time your sales team actually spends on selling. Project management, administrative follow-up, and billing are all important aspects of converting sales into revenue. They do not, however, directly bring in new customers and business.

In a strategic planning meeting with a client, we determined that less than 20% of their sales team’s time was spent in direct contact with prospects and customers. Through a process of strategic delegation of tasks, they were able to increase the time spent selling to over 40 percent. That’s equivalent to doubling the size of the sales team, without having to recruit or train a single new sales rep!

I’ve recently published two articles outlining this concept. To learn more about strategic delegation, see a short article available at IndustryWeek Online. A more detailed article is available in the Spring Issue of Wiley Periodicals’ Employment Relations Today.

Posted in HR Management, Marketing, Strategic Planning | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Anecdotal evidence that it’s time to shift to a growth focus

A colleague of mine has noticed a dramatic shift in his recent eBay sales. This shift suggests that consumer confidence in the economy has grown considerably.

On eBay, he is seeing increased sales of higher-end “desirables” such as Coach purses and collectibles. This is an indicator of an increase in disposable income and an overall feeling that the future job market will be stable.

I believe there is a window during which you can re-energize your team and shift their eyes to generating and managing growth before everyone else does. Getting your team a couple of steps ahead of the competition can have a huge payoff.

As always, I believe that team-based strategic planning is a powerful, well-proven tool to help you quickly make the jump. Take a look at what other CEOs have said about the immediate business impact of their strategic planning efforts.

Posted in Marketing, Strategic Planning | Leave a comment

Make sure your pricing doesn’t hide your true value to the customer

I started working with Scientific Time Sharing Corporation in 1969, when they had only six employees. For fifteen years, STSC, as we renamed it, was my home away from home. It was the place I found the love of my life, my partner and wife Mary. It was the place I learned a myriad of business lessons that shaped my life and career. It was the first time I experienced the power of strategic planning and the danger of being wrong about pricing.

I thought STSC was in the business of developing and selling access to the most powerful and productive IBM mainframe-based computer time-sharing service in existence. This was a natural assumption, given that we billed our customers based on their access to our centralized computer. We billed customers monthly for the total number of minutes each company’s users were dialed into our computer, the number of mainframe CPU seconds those users consumed, and the bytes of data they stored.

I thought our pricing reflected the value our customers received from us. I was wrong! In fact, the true value our top customers received was our ability to assist them in the rapid development of custom applications and support that application’s use nationally through our extensive branch offices. Our business model was simple. Develop and extend customer applications for free. Make our money every time the application ran. STSC grew by supporting the application at each of the customer’s remote locations. Better application development support led to more applications. Better support of each customer’s application led to more users for each application. More application users led to more usage of our computer. More computer usage led to rapid revenue growth for STSC.

For a long time it didn’t matter how we priced. Our customers couldn’t afford to purchase and operate the specialized hardware and software required to match our service. Since the users were billed for minutes, seconds, and bytes they assumed that was what they were paying for. They were wrong too, but it didn’t matter.

At least, it didn’t matter until technology advanced to a point where our customers could afford to purchase hardware themselves. Then STSC’s customers started leaping to an obvious, albeit incorrect, conclusion that they were being ripped off. Customers were increasingly commenting on their billing. “I can buy a disk drive for less than what I pay STSC for a year’s storage.” “My IT manager tells me he can lease a dedicated computer to run my applications for less than I pay STSC monthly.” I explained to customers that we were only billing them based on minutes, seconds, and bytes. But what they were actually paying for was access to a 24/7, nationwide application development and support organization at their beck and call. Unfortunately, it was too late. Most customers remained unconvinced. They had trouble recognizing the value of the development and support services that we always gave them for free. They were comparing apple pie with oranges.

The initial impact of appearing to be too costly was a decline in the growth of new applications being built to run on our service. Times were good and managers were focused on developing new systems and capabilities, not reducing the cost of a working system. If it’s not broke why fix it, even if it’s somewhat expensive? After all, there was a non-trivial risk and cost to moving an application in-house. Along came back-to-back recessions and managers shifted their focus to cutting costs. Overnight, all outside services were targeted. Applications were rapidly moved in-house with the aid of motivated IT managers and hardware suppliers. Some end users even began to take control of their applications using newfangled PCs.

The time-sharing market collapsed, with one service company after another biting the dust. STSC, with its misdirected pricing, was an early victim of the shift.

I made a point of talking to our lost STSC customers a year after they transferred their applications. They’d say: “You were right John. It now costs us more to run and support those applications than it did when we had them on your service. But, that’s water under the bridge, it’s too bad we can’t shift them back.”

I tell this story to emphasize that you are at risk whenever you “bundle” elements of your product to simplify billing. You are vulnerable to inappropriate price comparisons when a substantial portion of your value is hidden from your customers’ view. This value might include the extra capacity you support to handle surge orders, the senior technical staff you maintain to assist a client in trouble-shooting their product. Your value might lie in your willingness to accept last-minute orders without penalty, the quality assurance built into the manufacturing, or the capital reserves required to survive late payments. All these add to the cost of your operations.

You will look over-priced if you allow your customer to do price comparisons with other suppliers without putting a dollar value on all these features. If the buyer insists on ignoring those “intangible” features, you have no choice but to sell unbundled and price for every individual service.

It’s important that your executive team understands your customer. Who actually signs the checks? What is the value they are actually paying for? A well-run strategic planning process helps keep everyone on the same page on many key issues, including pricing. Take a look at what strategic planning can do for you.

Posted in Marketing, Strategic Planning | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

KISS – Keep it Simple and Stupid

According to Wikipedia, the originator of the KISS acronom said it stood for keep it simple and stupid.

I have a philosophy that a new product, system, or process like strategic planning is unlikely to be implementable if it doesn’t appear to be almost “trivial.” President Ronald Reagan once said “there are no easy answers, but there are simple answers.”

Take a look at my March 2010 newsletter for more thoughts on KISS as applied to policy manuals, performance reviews, and strategic planning.

Posted in Strategic Planning | Leave a comment